![]() ![]() the King James Version, or simply the Authorized Version) remains the most famous Bible translation in history-and one of the most printed books ever. ![]() Its majestic cadences would inspire generations of artists, poets, musicians and political leaders, while many of its specific phrases worked their way into the fabric of the language itself.Įven now, more than four centuries after its publication, the King James Bible (a.k.a. Thanks to emerging printing technology, the new translation brought the Bible out of the church’s sole control and directly into the hands of more people than ever before, including the Protestant reformers who settled England’s North American colonies in the 17th century.Įmerging at a high point in the English Renaissance, the King James Bible held its own among some of the most celebrated literary works in the English language (think William Shakespeare). Would you like to use our comparison chart for teaching or publication? Download the chart (available in both color and b/w) and please use the following credit: Bible Translation Guide, courtesy of God’s Word to the Nations Mission Society, Orange Park, FL 32067.In 1604, England’s King James I authorized a new translation of the Bible aimed at settling some thorny religious differences in his kingdom-and solidifying his own power.īut in seeking to prove his own supremacy, King James ended up democratizing the Bible instead. How does closest natural equivalence maintain the balance? » SHOP FOR A BIBLE NOW « The goal of closest natural equivalence is to communicate as much of the source text as possible in a way that is usable for the type of readers that the original author targeted. How does paraphrase compare to closest natural equivalence? Closest Natural Equivalence Maintains the BalanceĬlosest natural equivalence focuses upon meaning and naturalness in the target language. How does functional equivalence compare to closest natural equivalence? Contrasting Closest Natural Equivalence to ParaphraseĪ paraphrase is a retelling of Scripture using an individual person’s words, in an attempt to make the meaning clearer. The functional equivalent theory is not concerned with preserving the maximum number of characteristics (e.g., word order, grammar, syntax, idioms, etc.) of the source language text, because it is often unnatural in the target language. Functional equivalence takes the differences between the source language and the target language seriously. It is called functional-equivalent translation. How does formal equivalence compare to closest natural equivalence? Contrasting Closest Natural Equivalence to Functional Equivalenceīecause of the problems associated with formal-equivalent translation, another translation theory was developed. Most translations of the Bible available in bookstores today use some variation of formal-equivalent translation. Most well-known English Holy Bible translations were produced using the traditional approach to translation which is called formal equivalence. » SHOP FOR A BIBLE NOW « Contrasting Closest Natural Equivalence to Formal Equivalence That’s why you can hear God’s word in clear, natural English.įor more information, download the complete brochure about the translation process of GOD’S WORD. ![]() In short, closest natural equivalence concentrates on accurately translating the meaning of the original languages into natural English.Īt the same time, closest natural equivalence retains as many of the unique characteristics of the original text as possible without making the English translation unnatural or harder to understand than the text was in the original languages. This theory is called closest natural equivalence. GOD’S WORD Translation Bible was produced using a theory of translation that combines accuracy with understandability. GOD’S WORD Bible Is in a Category All Its Own How does the GOD’S WORD Translation Bible compare to other Holy Bibles? Learn about some of the major differences between the clear, natural English of GOD’S WORD Bible and other translations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |